Security Blog

The latest news and insights from Google on security and safety on the Internet

More Information about Malware Details

24 noiembrie 2009
Share on Twitter Share on Facebook
Google

4 comentarii :

Alison Massa spunea...

I am not a webmaster, just an ordinary web user. Are you aware of what I presume to be fake Google pages that come up uninvited whenever I have IE7 open? The pages use the Google logo and are filled with advertising. When I first encountered the problem, page names included:
• Newspedia
• Main Stories
• Business Rumours
• Culture and Arts.

Sometimes after being away from my computer for a while, I would find 15-20 pages open. There is also a page with a Windows-like logo called Joomla! That page says “Torrid Reviews – This site is temporarily unavailable. Please notify the System Administrator.”

I assumed this was malware and spent $140 to have Symantecs NortonLive try to find the source. Norton techniciands in India had never seen this problem and had to consult with their Research team. On the second attempt, after many hours, one technician seemed to have solved the matter. However, the problem is back, this time with the following page titles:
• Torrid Reviews
• Profitable Stories
• Medicine Tales
• Whacking Stuff
• Marketing Stories

The pages are clearly produced by malware because of the ridiculous titles, menu items and misspellings. Now that I'm reading this blog, I'm wondering why Symantecs has not been provided with your warnings and tools? I really feel that I should be reimbursed for the Symantecs charge. In any case,please advise me on whether I should go back to Symantecs or, if not, what tool to use to eliminate this problem.

Thank you,
Alison Massa

9 ianuarie 2010 la 17:07
Alison Massa spunea...

Since I wrote this comment, I'm happy to say that I found Malwarebytes Anti-Malware. It worked snd the problem has not returned. It was the only product I tried that both found and removed the problem for free. I found it through a Foxfire blog, http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/forum/1/516688 -- where many users were complaining about the fake Google invasion
I hope Google is taking full note of this.

30 ianuarie 2010 la 13:59
Mad2y spunea...

Hi,

Are you aware of intruder alerts from 209.85.231.83 server?
Is subnet scan from same server a valid one from Google.

Please reply to Sudarshan.ms@gmail.com

Thank you,
Sudarshan

10 februarie 2010 la 03:40
Certified Ethical Hacker spunea...

browser exploits will always come up, maybe all we could is slow them down.


for free basic-to-advanced ethical hacking tutorials visit :

pinoysecurity.blogspot.com

16 februarie 2010 la 03:04

Trimiteți un comentariu

  

Etichete


  • #sharethemicincyber
  • #supplychain #security #opensource
  • android
  • android security
  • android tr
  • app security
  • big data
  • biometrics
  • blackhat
  • C++
  • chrome
  • chrome enterprise
  • chrome security
  • connected devices
  • CTF
  • diversity
  • encryption
  • federated learning
  • fuzzing
  • Gboard
  • google play
  • google play protect
  • hacking
  • interoperability
  • iot security
  • kubernetes
  • linux kernel
  • memory safety
  • Open Source
  • pha family highlights
  • pixel
  • privacy
  • private compute core
  • Rowhammer
  • rust
  • Security
  • security rewards program
  • sigstore
  • spyware
  • supply chain
  • targeted spyware
  • tensor
  • Titan M2
  • VDP
  • vulnerabilities
  • workshop


Archive


  •     2025
    • mai
    • apr.
    • mar.
    • feb.
    • ian.
  •     2024
    • dec.
    • nov.
    • oct.
    • sept.
    • aug.
    • iul.
    • iun.
    • mai
    • apr.
    • mar.
    • feb.
    • ian.
  •     2023
    • dec.
    • nov.
    • oct.
    • sept.
    • aug.
    • iul.
    • iun.
    • mai
    • apr.
    • mar.
    • feb.
    • ian.
  •     2022
    • dec.
    • nov.
    • oct.
    • sept.
    • aug.
    • iul.
    • iun.
    • mai
    • apr.
    • mar.
    • feb.
    • ian.
  •     2021
    • dec.
    • nov.
    • oct.
    • sept.
    • aug.
    • iul.
    • iun.
    • mai
    • apr.
    • mar.
    • feb.
    • ian.
  •     2020
    • dec.
    • nov.
    • oct.
    • sept.
    • aug.
    • iul.
    • iun.
    • mai
    • apr.
    • mar.
    • feb.
    • ian.
  •     2019
    • dec.
    • nov.
    • oct.
    • sept.
    • aug.
    • iul.
    • iun.
    • mai
    • apr.
    • mar.
    • feb.
    • ian.
  •     2018
    • dec.
    • nov.
    • oct.
    • sept.
    • aug.
    • iul.
    • iun.
    • mai
    • apr.
    • mar.
    • feb.
    • ian.
  •     2017
    • dec.
    • nov.
    • oct.
    • sept.
    • iul.
    • iun.
    • mai
    • apr.
    • mar.
    • feb.
    • ian.
  •     2016
    • dec.
    • nov.
    • oct.
    • sept.
    • aug.
    • iul.
    • iun.
    • mai
    • apr.
    • mar.
    • feb.
    • ian.
  •     2015
    • dec.
    • nov.
    • oct.
    • sept.
    • aug.
    • iul.
    • iun.
    • mai
    • apr.
    • mar.
    • feb.
    • ian.
  •     2014
    • dec.
    • nov.
    • oct.
    • sept.
    • aug.
    • iul.
    • iun.
    • apr.
    • mar.
    • feb.
    • ian.
  •     2013
    • dec.
    • nov.
    • oct.
    • aug.
    • iun.
    • mai
    • apr.
    • mar.
    • feb.
    • ian.
  •     2012
    • dec.
    • sept.
    • aug.
    • iun.
    • mai
    • apr.
    • mar.
    • feb.
    • ian.
  •     2011
    • dec.
    • nov.
    • oct.
    • sept.
    • aug.
    • iul.
    • iun.
    • mai
    • apr.
    • mar.
    • feb.
  •     2010
    • nov.
    • oct.
    • sept.
    • aug.
    • iul.
    • mai
    • apr.
    • mar.
  •     2009
    • nov.
    • oct.
    • aug.
    • iul.
    • iun.
    • mar.
  •     2008
    • dec.
    • nov.
    • oct.
    • aug.
    • iul.
    • mai
    • feb.
  •     2007
    • nov.
    • oct.
    • sept.
    • iul.
    • iun.
    • mai

Feed

Follow
Give us feedback in our Product Forums.
  • Google
  • Privacy
  • Terms