Security Blog

The latest news and insights from Google on security and safety on the Internet

Extending SSL to Google search

21. maj 2010
Share on Twitter Share on Facebook
Google

8 kommentarer :

Unknown sagde ...

to make it work do this:

First visit: http://www.google.com/ncr

Then visit:
https://www.google.com/webhp

That should do it..

22. maj 2010 kl. 00.41
Myron Warach sagde ...

Currently, when a user clicks a cached snapshot link in Google's search engine results list, a URL displays that includes in clear text both the cached website URL and the user's search keywords.

Example:

Search keywords: [ski equipment]

An example clear text URL of an arbitrary web site clicked from Google's search results: http://www.skis.com

An example clear text URL of the related cached web site clicked from Google's search engine results: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:t3SmcuNSLKIJ:www.skis.com/+ski+equipment&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk

Google's cached website versions usually do not display an entire web site. However, it would enhance user security and privacy if Google encrypted the URLs it displays for its cached web sites.

http://googcomments.blogspot.com

22. maj 2010 kl. 05.23
Just Me sagde ...

how about some SSL support for iGoogle ?

i keep trying to use iGoogle via https but every iGoogle page gets redirected via regular http :|

22. maj 2010 kl. 14.34
Unknown sagde ...

I hope SSL search works or Google. I know there is a lot of testing first, but at least Google is taking the first step, to keep evil out.

24. maj 2010 kl. 14.05
Anonym sagde ...

Just tried it in the UK and it works fine for me

31. maj 2010 kl. 13.51
Anonym sagde ...

Hmm..
Did google already notice..
now many wordpress user use SEO SearchTerms2 and Bstat plugin ?

And search engines are now filled with garbage..

This is very annoying at all..

2. juni 2010 kl. 22.29
JohnH sagde ...

Putting the secure search onto the same URL as Google Apps authentication will cause major problems for schools as it bypasses their filtering and will therefore be blocked by many Local Authorities (UK) and schools districts (USA). Either secure search or account authentication needs to be moved to a distinct domain so they can be differentially filtered.

7. juni 2010 kl. 17.22
Unknown sagde ...

I agree, but I don't understand why Contacts service i out of SSL protection.

30. juli 2010 kl. 12.26

Send en kommentar

  

Etiketter


  • #sharethemicincyber
  • #supplychain #security #opensource
  • AI Security
  • android
  • android security
  • android tr
  • app security
  • big data
  • biometrics
  • blackhat
  • C++
  • chrome
  • chrome enterprise
  • chrome security
  • connected devices
  • CTF
  • diversity
  • encryption
  • federated learning
  • fuzzing
  • Gboard
  • google play
  • google play protect
  • hacking
  • interoperability
  • iot security
  • kubernetes
  • linux kernel
  • memory safety
  • Open Source
  • pha family highlights
  • pixel
  • privacy
  • private compute core
  • Rowhammer
  • rust
  • Security
  • security rewards program
  • sigstore
  • spyware
  • supply chain
  • targeted spyware
  • tensor
  • Titan M2
  • VDP
  • vulnerabilities
  • workshop


Archive


  •     2025
    • jun.
    • maj
    • apr.
    • mar.
    • feb.
    • jan.
  •     2024
    • dec.
    • nov.
    • okt.
    • sep.
    • aug.
    • jul.
    • jun.
    • maj
    • apr.
    • mar.
    • feb.
    • jan.
  •     2023
    • dec.
    • nov.
    • okt.
    • sep.
    • aug.
    • jul.
    • jun.
    • maj
    • apr.
    • mar.
    • feb.
    • jan.
  •     2022
    • dec.
    • nov.
    • okt.
    • sep.
    • aug.
    • jul.
    • jun.
    • maj
    • apr.
    • mar.
    • feb.
    • jan.
  •     2021
    • dec.
    • nov.
    • okt.
    • sep.
    • aug.
    • jul.
    • jun.
    • maj
    • apr.
    • mar.
    • feb.
    • jan.
  •     2020
    • dec.
    • nov.
    • okt.
    • sep.
    • aug.
    • jul.
    • jun.
    • maj
    • apr.
    • mar.
    • feb.
    • jan.
  •     2019
    • dec.
    • nov.
    • okt.
    • sep.
    • aug.
    • jul.
    • jun.
    • maj
    • apr.
    • mar.
    • feb.
    • jan.
  •     2018
    • dec.
    • nov.
    • okt.
    • sep.
    • aug.
    • jul.
    • jun.
    • maj
    • apr.
    • mar.
    • feb.
    • jan.
  •     2017
    • dec.
    • nov.
    • okt.
    • sep.
    • jul.
    • jun.
    • maj
    • apr.
    • mar.
    • feb.
    • jan.
  •     2016
    • dec.
    • nov.
    • okt.
    • sep.
    • aug.
    • jul.
    • jun.
    • maj
    • apr.
    • mar.
    • feb.
    • jan.
  •     2015
    • dec.
    • nov.
    • okt.
    • sep.
    • aug.
    • jul.
    • jun.
    • maj
    • apr.
    • mar.
    • feb.
    • jan.
  •     2014
    • dec.
    • nov.
    • okt.
    • sep.
    • aug.
    • jul.
    • jun.
    • apr.
    • mar.
    • feb.
    • jan.
  •     2013
    • dec.
    • nov.
    • okt.
    • aug.
    • jun.
    • maj
    • apr.
    • mar.
    • feb.
    • jan.
  •     2012
    • dec.
    • sep.
    • aug.
    • jun.
    • maj
    • apr.
    • mar.
    • feb.
    • jan.
  •     2011
    • dec.
    • nov.
    • okt.
    • sep.
    • aug.
    • jul.
    • jun.
    • maj
    • apr.
    • mar.
    • feb.
  •     2010
    • nov.
    • okt.
    • sep.
    • aug.
    • jul.
    • maj
    • apr.
    • mar.
  •     2009
    • nov.
    • okt.
    • aug.
    • jul.
    • jun.
    • mar.
  •     2008
    • dec.
    • nov.
    • okt.
    • aug.
    • jul.
    • maj
    • feb.
  •     2007
    • nov.
    • okt.
    • sep.
    • jul.
    • jun.
    • maj

Feed

Follow
Give us feedback in our Product Forums.
  • Google
  • Privacy
  • Terms