Security Blog

The latest news and insights from Google on security and safety on the Internet

Disclosure timeline for vulnerabilities under active attack

29 mei 2013
Share on Twitter Share on Facebook
Google

7 opmerkingen :

ëRiC zei

Incredible that this is still debated at all! If you have wide spread software and there is a critical security hole: You fix it! NAO!

7 days is nice as a start. But actually bits and bytes know speed a little different than us puny humans. 7 days is enough to infect the whole world!

30 mei 2013 om 06:02
chillzwerg zei

Better and faster security. Superb!

30 mei 2013 om 11:14
voodooKobra zei

I approve of this maneuver. If the vendor doesn't respond after a week, they cannot be trusted to secure their customers.

30 mei 2013 om 14:41
killbit zei

This is a fantastic policy for companies that are cloud based such as good. However those companies that provide enterprise software a customer has to install and test. is NOT going to be able to fix, test, release to customer, customer pick up the fix, customer test, submit change requests and deploy in < 7 days. You guys are going to expose more customers to these sorts of issues. Why not work with the companies to release guidance if they can't fix the issue. Google has no idea about enterprise customers. No enterprise is going to pick up any software from you they have to deploy.

30 mei 2013 om 16:15
Unknown zei

I like it. Way to keep us safe :-D

30 mei 2013 om 16:37
Anoniem zei

Will you also be holding the rest of Google to the same standard?

31 mei 2013 om 09:36
Joe Philipps zei

Compared to some researchers, this is charitable. A certain proportion of them think full disclosure should be the norm so that the affected parties can begin to mitigate the trouble.

31 mei 2013 om 15:27

Een reactie posten

  

Labels


  • #sharethemicincyber
  • #supplychain #security #opensource
  • AI Security
  • android
  • android security
  • android tr
  • app security
  • big data
  • biometrics
  • blackhat
  • C++
  • chrome
  • chrome enterprise
  • chrome security
  • connected devices
  • CTF
  • diversity
  • encryption
  • federated learning
  • fuzzing
  • Gboard
  • google play
  • google play protect
  • hacking
  • interoperability
  • iot security
  • kubernetes
  • linux kernel
  • memory safety
  • Open Source
  • pha family highlights
  • pixel
  • privacy
  • private compute core
  • Rowhammer
  • rust
  • Security
  • security rewards program
  • sigstore
  • spyware
  • supply chain
  • targeted spyware
  • tensor
  • Titan M2
  • VDP
  • vulnerabilities
  • workshop


Archive


  •     2026
    • apr
    • mrt
    • feb
    • jan
  •     2025
    • dec
    • nov
    • okt
    • sep
    • aug
    • jul
    • jun
    • mei
    • apr
    • mrt
    • feb
    • jan
  •     2024
    • dec
    • nov
    • okt
    • sep
    • aug
    • jul
    • jun
    • mei
    • apr
    • mrt
    • feb
    • jan
  •     2023
    • dec
    • nov
    • okt
    • sep
    • aug
    • jul
    • jun
    • mei
    • apr
    • mrt
    • feb
    • jan
  •     2022
    • dec
    • nov
    • okt
    • sep
    • aug
    • jul
    • jun
    • mei
    • apr
    • mrt
    • feb
    • jan
  •     2021
    • dec
    • nov
    • okt
    • sep
    • aug
    • jul
    • jun
    • mei
    • apr
    • mrt
    • feb
    • jan
  •     2020
    • dec
    • nov
    • okt
    • sep
    • aug
    • jul
    • jun
    • mei
    • apr
    • mrt
    • feb
    • jan
  •     2019
    • dec
    • nov
    • okt
    • sep
    • aug
    • jul
    • jun
    • mei
    • apr
    • mrt
    • feb
    • jan
  •     2018
    • dec
    • nov
    • okt
    • sep
    • aug
    • jul
    • jun
    • mei
    • apr
    • mrt
    • feb
    • jan
  •     2017
    • dec
    • nov
    • okt
    • sep
    • jul
    • jun
    • mei
    • apr
    • mrt
    • feb
    • jan
  •     2016
    • dec
    • nov
    • okt
    • sep
    • aug
    • jul
    • jun
    • mei
    • apr
    • mrt
    • feb
    • jan
  •     2015
    • dec
    • nov
    • okt
    • sep
    • aug
    • jul
    • jun
    • mei
    • apr
    • mrt
    • feb
    • jan
  •     2014
    • dec
    • nov
    • okt
    • sep
    • aug
    • jul
    • jun
    • apr
    • mrt
    • feb
    • jan
  •     2013
    • dec
    • nov
    • okt
    • aug
    • jun
    • mei
    • apr
    • mrt
    • feb
    • jan
  •     2012
    • dec
    • sep
    • aug
    • jun
    • mei
    • apr
    • mrt
    • feb
    • jan
  •     2011
    • dec
    • nov
    • okt
    • sep
    • aug
    • jul
    • jun
    • mei
    • apr
    • mrt
    • feb
  •     2010
    • nov
    • okt
    • sep
    • aug
    • jul
    • mei
    • apr
    • mrt
  •     2009
    • nov
    • okt
    • aug
    • jul
    • jun
    • mrt
  •     2008
    • dec
    • nov
    • okt
    • aug
    • jul
    • mei
    • feb
  •     2007
    • nov
    • okt
    • sep
    • jul
    • jun
    • mei

Feed

Follow
Give us feedback in our Product Forums.
  • Google
  • Privacy
  • Terms