Security Blog

The latest news and insights from Google on security and safety on the Internet

Increased rewards for Google’s Web Vulnerability Reward Program

6 giugno 2013
Share on Twitter Share on Facebook
Google

12 commenti :

Anonimo ha detto...

i'm glad you're so concerned with security. i wish you were concerned enough to not deliver my emails and chats to the US government. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/06/us-tech-giants-nsa-data

i'm extremely disappointed in you Google. i'm Canadian, tell me this article isn't true. Or better yet, just delete this comment and pretend everything's great.

6 giugno 2013 alle ore 22:17
Jean-Marc Liotier ha detto...

Sadly, no one bothered to report the vulnerability of Google to government mass surveillance - I'm sure that Google would have promptly fixed them and rewarded the reporter.

7 giugno 2013 alle ore 02:18
Unknown ha detto...

Exploit: Allows an attacker full access to gmail, videos, photos, voice/video chat, contacts, etc.

Steps to reproduce: Send Google a letter saying that you represent the NSA. Add a post script saying, "hey, this is just between us."

7 giugno 2013 alle ore 11:06
Nir Goldshlager ha detto...

Great Rewards, Hack The Bug!

7 giugno 2013 alle ore 12:45
Unknown ha detto...

Perhaps this particular incentive would be better focused internally, rather than eternally. Having the most secure browser (or OS) means little if the data isn't safeguarded on the back end.

Having had little confidence in the transparency of Google (and other providers) with regard to government requests for customer information and activity, it is likely that denials will be forthcoming. And even if Google and the others were unwilling participants in PRISM, it certainly denigrates their credibility in matters of security.

7 giugno 2013 alle ore 14:20
dimadz ha detto...

this is amazing

10 giugno 2013 alle ore 02:02
Anonimo ha detto...

That is good to know how much Google value holes in its arse. But what about usability bugs? Or people/ customer’s satisfaction is worthless for Google?

11 giugno 2013 alle ore 10:06
Optimistic Mind ha detto...

Well, u shud increase da bounty price more! That's too less 4 u Google..

26 giugno 2013 alle ore 23:36
Vedachala ha detto...

Awesome Rewards! It's time to hack bounties :D

7 agosto 2013 alle ore 23:07
Unknown ha detto...

uhm wish i knwe some code, i could make a living out of this

13 agosto 2013 alle ore 00:57
Moonlighting Online ha detto...

I have taken all the security measures printed by Google and others, but my password continues to get changed with email and Google products reviewed; including Adsense and PayPal activity. When I login w/2step verif. n codes, etc. a hacker is able to wedge in from somewhere. Then my pswrd is change, access to dashboard/activity are blocked w their password, notifications are permanently turned off , other changes are made n re-login does not allow 2step again. By the time I get a new pswrd n logged back in, the culprit already has what he/she came for. This is a new one on me. I have been wrestling with this one all day today.

6 settembre 2013 alle ore 22:35
Wittman ha detto...

I have similiar problem. My open ID is common known (I didn't register any. Intruders got acces to my G plus, Gmail, Blogger, Picassa, Chrome, YouTube. Two times I revoke account on G wallet - though I didn't register on it. I used to love Google but now I start to hate it. I can't delete one account e.g. because I'll
lost all of them - includes Youtube where I'm
present since 2006.

7 dicembre 2013 alle ore 12:24

Posta un commento

  

Etichette


  • #sharethemicincyber
  • #supplychain #security #opensource
  • android
  • android security
  • android tr
  • app security
  • big data
  • biometrics
  • blackhat
  • C++
  • chrome
  • chrome enterprise
  • chrome security
  • connected devices
  • CTF
  • diversity
  • encryption
  • federated learning
  • fuzzing
  • Gboard
  • google play
  • google play protect
  • hacking
  • interoperability
  • iot security
  • kubernetes
  • linux kernel
  • memory safety
  • Open Source
  • pha family highlights
  • pixel
  • privacy
  • private compute core
  • Rowhammer
  • rust
  • Security
  • security rewards program
  • sigstore
  • spyware
  • supply chain
  • targeted spyware
  • tensor
  • Titan M2
  • VDP
  • vulnerabilities
  • workshop


Archive


  •     2025
    • mag
    • apr
    • mar
    • feb
    • gen
  •     2024
    • dic
    • nov
    • ott
    • set
    • ago
    • lug
    • giu
    • mag
    • apr
    • mar
    • feb
    • gen
  •     2023
    • dic
    • nov
    • ott
    • set
    • ago
    • lug
    • giu
    • mag
    • apr
    • mar
    • feb
    • gen
  •     2022
    • dic
    • nov
    • ott
    • set
    • ago
    • lug
    • giu
    • mag
    • apr
    • mar
    • feb
    • gen
  •     2021
    • dic
    • nov
    • ott
    • set
    • ago
    • lug
    • giu
    • mag
    • apr
    • mar
    • feb
    • gen
  •     2020
    • dic
    • nov
    • ott
    • set
    • ago
    • lug
    • giu
    • mag
    • apr
    • mar
    • feb
    • gen
  •     2019
    • dic
    • nov
    • ott
    • set
    • ago
    • lug
    • giu
    • mag
    • apr
    • mar
    • feb
    • gen
  •     2018
    • dic
    • nov
    • ott
    • set
    • ago
    • lug
    • giu
    • mag
    • apr
    • mar
    • feb
    • gen
  •     2017
    • dic
    • nov
    • ott
    • set
    • lug
    • giu
    • mag
    • apr
    • mar
    • feb
    • gen
  •     2016
    • dic
    • nov
    • ott
    • set
    • ago
    • lug
    • giu
    • mag
    • apr
    • mar
    • feb
    • gen
  •     2015
    • dic
    • nov
    • ott
    • set
    • ago
    • lug
    • giu
    • mag
    • apr
    • mar
    • feb
    • gen
  •     2014
    • dic
    • nov
    • ott
    • set
    • ago
    • lug
    • giu
    • apr
    • mar
    • feb
    • gen
  •     2013
    • dic
    • nov
    • ott
    • ago
    • giu
    • mag
    • apr
    • mar
    • feb
    • gen
  •     2012
    • dic
    • set
    • ago
    • giu
    • mag
    • apr
    • mar
    • feb
    • gen
  •     2011
    • dic
    • nov
    • ott
    • set
    • ago
    • lug
    • giu
    • mag
    • apr
    • mar
    • feb
  •     2010
    • nov
    • ott
    • set
    • ago
    • lug
    • mag
    • apr
    • mar
  •     2009
    • nov
    • ott
    • ago
    • lug
    • giu
    • mar
  •     2008
    • dic
    • nov
    • ott
    • ago
    • lug
    • mag
    • feb
  •     2007
    • nov
    • ott
    • set
    • lug
    • giu
    • mag

Feed

Follow
Give us feedback in our Product Forums.
  • Google
  • Privacy
  • Terms