Security Blog
The latest news and insights from Google on security and safety on the Internet
Android Security & Privacy Year in Review 2018: Keeping two billion users, and their data, safe and sound
29 mars 2019
Posted by Meghan Kelly, Android Security & Privacy Team
We're excited to release today the
2018 Android Security and Privacy Year in Review
. This year's report highlights the advancements we made in Android throughout the year, and how we've worked to keep the overall ecosystem secure.
Our goal is to be open and transparent in everything we do. We want to make sure we keep our users, partners, enterprise customers, and developers up to date on the latest security and privacy enhancements in as close to real-time as possible. To that end, in 2018 we prioritized regularly providing updates through our blogs and our new
Transparency Reports
, which give a quarterly ecosystem overview. In this year-in-review, you'll see fewer words and more links to relevant articles from the previous year. Check out our
Android Security Center
to get the latest on these advancements.
In this year's report, some of our top highlights include:
New features in Google Play Protect
Ecosystem and Potentially Harmful Application family highlights
Updates on our vulnerability rewards program
Platform security enhancements
We're also excited to have Dave Kleidermacher, Vice President of Android Security and Privacy, give you a rundown of the highlights from this report. Watch his video below to learn more.
Managed Google Play earns key certifications for security and privacy
21 mars 2019
Posted by Mike Burr, Android Enterprise Platform Specialist
[Cross-posted from the
Android Enterprise Keyword Blog
]
With managed Google Play, organizations can build a customized and secure mobile application storefront for their teams, featuring public and private applications. Organizations' employees can take advantage of the familiarity of a mobile app store to browse and download company-approved apps.
As with any enterprise-grade platform, it's critical that the
managed Google Play Store
operates with the highest standards of privacy and security. Managed Google Play has been awarded three important industry designations that are marks of meeting the strict requirements for information security management practices.
Granted by the
International Organization for Standardization
, achieving ISO 27001 certification demonstrates that a company meets stringent privacy and security standards when operating an Information Security Management System (ISMS). Additionally, managed Google Play received SOC 2 and 3 reports, which are benchmarks of strict data management and privacy controls. These designations and auditing procedures are developed by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
(AICPA).
Meeting a high bar of security management standards
To earn the ISO 27001 certification, auditors from Ernst and Young performed a thorough audit of managed Google Play based on established privacy principles. The entire methodology of documentation and procedures for managing other companies' data are reviewed during an audit, and must be made available for regular compliance review. Companies that use managed Google Play are assured their data is managed in compliance with this industry standard. Additionally, ISO 27001 certification is in line with GDPR compliance.
Secure data management
With SOC 2 and SOC 3 reports, the focus is on controls relevant to data security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality and privacy, which are verified through auditing reports. In managed Google Play, the data and private applications that enter Google's systems are administered according to strict protocols, including determinations for who can view them and under what conditions. Enterprises require and receive the assurance that their information is handled with the utmost confidentiality and that the integrity of their data is preserved. For many companies, the presence of an SOC 2 and 3 report is a requirement when selecting a specific service. These reports prove that a service company has met and is abiding by best practices set forth by AICPA to ensure data security.
Our ongoing commitment to enterprise security
With managed Google Play, companies' private apps for internal use are protected with a set of verified information security management processes and policies to ensure intellectual property is secure. This framework includes managed Google Play accounts that are used by enterprise mobility management (EMM) partners to manage devices.
Our commitment is that Android will continue to be a leader in enterprise security. As your team works across devices and shares mission-critical data through applications hosted in managed Google Play, you have the assurance of a commitment to providing your enterprise the highest standards of security and privacy.
Open-sourcing Sandboxed API
18 mars 2019
Posted by Christian Blichmann & Robert Swiecki, ISE Sandboxing team
Many software projects process data which is externally generated, and thus potentially untrusted. For example, this could be the conversion of user-provided picture files into different formats, or even executing user-generated software code.
When a software library parsing such data is sufficiently complex, it might fall victim to certain types of security vulnerabilities:
memory corruption bugs
or certain other types of problems related to the parsing logic (e.g.
path traversal
issues). Those vulnerabilities can have serious security implications.
In order to mitigate those problems, developers frequently employ software isolation methods, a process commonly referred to as
sandboxing
. By using sandboxing methods, developers make sure that only resources (files, networking connections and other operating system resources) which are deemed necessary are accessible to the code involved in parsing user-generated content. In the worst-case scenario, when potential attackers gain
remote code execution
rights within the scope of a software project, a sandboxing technique can contain them, protecting the rest of the software infrastructure.
Sandboxing techniques must be highly resistant to attacks and sufficiently protect the rest of the operating system, yet must be sufficiently easy-to-use for software developers. Many popular software containment tools might not sufficiently isolate the rest of the OS, and those which do, might require time-consuming redefinition of security boundaries for each and every project that should be sandboxed.
Sandbox once, use anywhere
To help with this task, we are open-sourcing our battle-tested project called
Sandboxed API
. Sandboxed API makes it possible to create security policies for individual software libraries. This concept allows to create reusable and secure implementations of functionality residing within popular software libraries, yet is granular enough to protect the rest of used software infrastructure.
As Sandboxed API serves the purpose of accessing individual software functions inside a sandboxed library, we are also making publicly available our core sandboxing project,
Sandbox2
. This is now part of Sandboxed API and provides the underlying sandboxing primitives. It can be also used standalone to isolate arbitrary Linux processes, but is considered a lower-level API.
Overview
Sandboxed API is currently implemented for software libraries written in the C programming language (or providing C bindings), though we might add support for more programming runtimes in the future.
From a high-level perspective, Sandboxed API separates the library to be sandboxed and its callers into two separate OS processes: the host binary and the sandboxee. Actual library calls are then marshalled by an API object on the host side and send via interprocess communication to the sandboxee where an RPC stub unmarshals and forwards calls to the original library.
Both the API object (SAPI object) and the RPC stub are provided by the project, with the former being auto-generated by an interface generator. Users just need to provide a sandbox policy, a set of system calls that the underlying library is allowed to make, as well as the resources it is allowed to access and use. Once ready, a library based on sandboxed API can easily be reused in other projects.
The resulting API of the SAPI object is similar to the one of the original library. For example, when using zlib, the popular compression library, a code snippet like this compresses a chunk of data (error handling omitted for brevity):
void Compress(const std::string& chunk, std::string* out) {
z_stream zst{};
constexpr char kZlibVersion[] = "1.2.11";
CHECK(deflateInit_(&zst, /*level=*/4, kZlibVersion, sizeof(zst)) == Z_OK);
zst.avail_in = chunk.size();
zst.next_in = reinterpret_cast<uint8_t*>(&chunk[0]);
zst.avail_out = out->size();
zst.next_out = reinterpret_cast<uint8_t*>(&(*out)[0]);
CHECK(deflate(&zst, Z_FINISH) != Z_STREAM_ERROR);
out->resize(zst.avail_out);
deflateEnd(&zst);
}
Using Sandboxed API, this becomes:
void CompressSapi(const std::string& chunk, std::string* out) {
sapi::Sandbox sandbox(sapi::zlib::zlib_sapi_embed_create());
CHECK(sandbox.Init().ok());
sapi::zlib::ZlibApi api(&sandbox);
sapi::v::Array<uint8_t> s_chunk(&chunk[0], chunk.size());
sapi::v::Array<uint8_t> s_out(&(*out)[0], out->size());
CHECK(sandbox.Allocate(&s_chunk).ok() && sandbox.Allocate(&s_out).ok());
sapi::v::Struct<sapi::zlib::z_stream> s_zst;
constexpr char kZlibVersion[] = "1.2.11";
sapi::v::Array<char> s_version(kZlibVersion, ABSL_ARRAYSIZE(kZlibVersion));
CHECK(api.deflateInit_(s_zst.PtrBoth(), /*level=*/4, s_version.PtrBefore(),
sizeof(sapi::zlib::z_stream).ValueOrDie() == Z_OK));
CHECK(sandbox.TransferToSandboxee(&s_chunk).ok());
s_zst.mutable_data()->avail_in = chunk.size();
s_zst.mutable_data()->next_in = reinterpet_cast<uint8_t*>(s_chunk.GetRemote());
s_zst.mutable_data()->avail_out = out->size();
s_zst.mutable_data()->next_out = reinterpret_cast<uint8_t*>(s_out.GetRemote());
CHECK(api.deflate(s_zst.PtrBoth(), Z_FINISH).ValueOrDie() != Z_STREAM_ERROR);
CHECK(sandbox.TransferFromSandboxee(&s_out).ok());
out->resize(s_zst.data().avail_out);
CHECK(api.deflateEnd(s_zst.PtrBoth()).ok());
}
As you can see, when using Sandboxed API there is extra code for setting up the sandbox itself and for transferring memory to and from the sandboxee, but other than that, the code flow stays the same.
Try for yourself
It only takes a few moments to get up and running with Sandboxed API. If
Bazel
is installed:
sudo apt-get install python-typing python-clang-7 libclang-7-dev linux-libc-dev
git clone github.com/google/sandboxed-api && cd sandboxed-api
bazel test //sandboxed_api/examples/stringop:main_stringop
This will download the necessary dependencies and run the project through its paces. More detailed instructions can be found in our
Getting Started
guide and be sure to check out the
examples for Sandboxed API
.
Where do we go from here?
Sandboxed API and Sandbox2 are used by many teams at Google. While the project is mature, we do have plans for the future beyond just maintaining it:
Support more operating systems - So far, only Linux is supported. We will look into bringing Sandboxed API to the Unix-like systems like the BSDs (FreeBSD, OpenBSD) and macOS. A Windows port is a bigger undertaking and will require some more groundwork to be done.
New sandboxing technologies - With things like hardware-virtualization becoming almost ubiquitous, confining code into VMs for sandboxing opens up new possibilities.
Build system - Right now, we are using Bazel to build everything, including dependencies. We acknowledge that this is not how everyone will want to use it, so CMake support is high on our priority list.
Spread the word - Use Sandboxed API to secure open source projects. If you want to get involved, this work is also eligible for the
Patch Reward Program
.
Get involved
We are constantly looking at improving Sandboxed API and Sandbox2 as well as adding more features: supporting more programming runtimes, different operating systems or alternative containment technologies.
Check out the
Sandboxed API GitHub repository
. We will be happy to consider your contributions and look forward to any suggestions to help improve and extend this code.
Disclosing vulnerabilities to protect users across platforms
7 mars 2019
Posted by Clement Lecigne, Threat Analysis Group
On Wednesday, February 27th, we reported two 0-day vulnerabilities — previously publicly-unknown vulnerabilities — one affecting Google Chrome and another in Microsoft Windows that were being exploited together.
To remediate the Chrome vulnerability (CVE-2019-5786), Google released an update for all Chrome platforms on March 1; this
update
was pushed through Chrome auto-update. We encourage users to verify that Chrome auto-update has already
updated Chrome
to 72.0.3626.121 or later.
The second vulnerability was in Microsoft Windows. It is a local privilege escalation in the Windows win32k.sys kernel driver that can be used as a security sandbox escape. The vulnerability is a NULL pointer dereference in
win32k!MNGetpItemFromIndex
when
NtUserMNDragOver()
system call is called under specific circumstances.
We strongly believe this vulnerability may only be exploitable on Windows 7 due to recent exploit mitigations added in newer versions of Windows. To date, we have only observed active exploitation against Windows 7 32-bit systems.
Pursuant to Google’s
vulnerability disclosure policy
, when we discovered the vulnerability we reported it to Microsoft. Today, also in compliance with our policy, we are publicly disclosing its existence, because it is a serious vulnerability in Windows that we know was being actively exploited in targeted attacks. The unpatched Windows vulnerability can still be used to elevate privileges or combined with another browser vulnerability to evade security sandboxes. Microsoft have told us they are working on a fix.
As mitigation advice for this vulnerability users should consider upgrading to Windows 10 if they are still running an older version of Windows, and to apply Windows patches from Microsoft when they become available. We will update this post when they are available.
Libellés
#sharethemicincyber
#supplychain #security #opensource
android
android security
android tr
app security
big data
biometrics
blackhat
C++
chrome
chrome enterprise
chrome security
connected devices
CTF
diversity
encryption
federated learning
fuzzing
Gboard
google play
google play protect
hacking
interoperability
iot security
kubernetes
linux kernel
memory safety
Open Source
pha family highlights
pixel
privacy
private compute core
Rowhammer
rust
Security
security rewards program
sigstore
spyware
supply chain
targeted spyware
tensor
Titan M2
VDP
vulnerabilities
workshop
Archive
2024
déc.
nov.
oct.
sept.
août
juil.
juin
mai
avr.
mars
févr.
janv.
2023
déc.
nov.
oct.
sept.
août
juil.
juin
mai
avr.
mars
févr.
janv.
2022
déc.
nov.
oct.
sept.
août
juil.
juin
mai
avr.
mars
févr.
janv.
2021
déc.
nov.
oct.
sept.
août
juil.
juin
mai
avr.
mars
févr.
janv.
2020
déc.
nov.
oct.
sept.
août
juil.
juin
mai
avr.
mars
févr.
janv.
2019
déc.
nov.
oct.
sept.
août
juil.
juin
mai
avr.
mars
févr.
janv.
2018
déc.
nov.
oct.
sept.
août
juil.
juin
mai
avr.
mars
févr.
janv.
2017
déc.
nov.
oct.
sept.
juil.
juin
mai
avr.
mars
févr.
janv.
2016
déc.
nov.
oct.
sept.
août
juil.
juin
mai
avr.
mars
févr.
janv.
2015
déc.
nov.
oct.
sept.
août
juil.
juin
mai
avr.
mars
févr.
janv.
2014
déc.
nov.
oct.
sept.
août
juil.
juin
avr.
mars
févr.
janv.
2013
déc.
nov.
oct.
août
juin
mai
avr.
mars
févr.
janv.
2012
déc.
sept.
août
juin
mai
avr.
mars
févr.
janv.
2011
déc.
nov.
oct.
sept.
août
juil.
juin
mai
avr.
mars
févr.
2010
nov.
oct.
sept.
août
juil.
mai
avr.
mars
2009
nov.
oct.
août
juil.
juin
mars
2008
déc.
nov.
oct.
août
juil.
mai
févr.
2007
nov.
oct.
sept.
juil.
juin
mai
Feed
Follow @google
Follow
Give us feedback in our
Product Forums
.
Follow